Bloomsburg Sign

Mayor and Town Representatives Show Strong Front in D.C.

On Wednesday, November 2nd, Mayor Dan Knorr, members of the Bloomsburg Town Council, the Bloomsburg Area Joint Flood Control Authority, the Columbia Montour Chamber of Commerce, Rieter Automotive, Windsor Foods, the Bloomsburg Fair Association and the Columbia County Commissioners met with US Senator Bob Casey, Congressman Lou Barletta, and staff from Senator Pat Toomey’s office to discuss federal government support for floodwall protection along the Susquehanna River and lower Fishing Creek.

Ostensibly what appeared to be yet another in a long series of meetings with federal government representatives and officials, instead presented a strong, united front of local government, business, and community leaders. Local representatives traveled to Washington to impress the common goal of preserving local industry and jobs, and sparing the residents of Bloomsburg yet another devastating experience.

Speaking of the importance of bringing community leaders together for a face to face meeting with federal legislators, Mayor Knorr stated “They have a lot of issues [to deal with]. They’re physically removed in DC and we wanted to be sure they knew what is a priority for us.”

“They were impressed at the broad range of cooperation, and that made a difference to them. Seeing them eye to eye, that we’re all on the same page, that was a primary purpose of this meeting.”

Council Member Diane Levan agreed. “They were amazed at how everyone had come together on this,” she said. “It’s unfortunate that it took this disaster, but they welcomed us, listened, were very concerned with our priorities and met with us in good faith.”

In addition to the unified front and goodwill felt at the meeting, both Mayor Knorr and Council Member Levan emphasized the specifics of what help Bloomsburg needed from the federal government. In particular this means a new Cost-Benefit analysis performed by the Army Corps of Engineers to determine to what extent, or if, the federal government would provide funding for the floodwall project.

“We know that [money] is tight at the federal level,” said Mayor Knorr. “This doesn’t mean projects aren’t happening, but they need to be prioritized.”

Although Senator Toomey was unable to attend this meeting in person due to commitments on the US Congressional Budgetary Supercommittee, sending instead members of his legislative staff, the Senator has already sent a letter to the Army Corps of Engineers, asking them to complete a new Cost-Benefit analysis for Bloomsburg in light of the recent flooding. The Senator’s letter identified the new analysis as “imperative” and “vitally important.”

The common front presented by community leaders, and their insistence on a specific course of federal action is already seeming to have an effect. Both Mayor Knorr and Council Member Levan expect the Army Corps of Engineers to begin their new analysis by the end of the year, possibly within the month.

“We also got commitment for follow up with [the Senators, Congressman, and their staffs] by the end of 2011,” said Mayor Knorr. “If not a new meeting with the representatives directly, then either a conference call or a meeting with their staff in Bloomsburg by the end of the year.”

“We can give millions to other countries when there are floods,” said Council Member Levan. “But manufacturing jobs are hard to come by. It’s going to take some meaningful effort to help the people in our own town who have gone through so much.”

Related Posts

4 thoughts on “Mayor and Town Representatives Show Strong Front in D.C.

  1. It’s very sad to see our community “leaders” pushing for a bogus corporate welfare project. They are exploiting the fears and paranoia of a shell shocked and devastated community. It is a distraction to realistic planning for the prevention and mitigation of future flooding. The truth is that the flood wall will eventually fail. And it is our leaders who are failing us now. If they would put half the effort into engaging the public as they are putting into this ridiculous flood wall idea we might actually have a chance at recovery and a solid plan for the future. Don’t be fooled into thinking that a flood wall will “spare the public from another devastating experience.” It is a lie.

  2. Well, it ain’t no flood wall, Dawg. They’ve been beating that dead horse for nearly 40 years. One possible approach would be to identify the source and take corrective action. Melissa Matthew’s article The View from Here: Melissa D. Matthews pointed to the following:

    “The concerns I continue to have involve increased building and paving projects (such as Walmart, Lowes, Buckhorn etc.,) insufficient drainage capacity, building on wetlands, increased flood protection upriver, the build up of debris in the creek including islands that had trees and shrubs growing on them, and possibly even climate change that raise the levels, frequency, and intensity of new flooding.”

  3. I have been to several meetings and for me cleaning Fishing Creek and any other water ways would be better and cheaper. They had a company some years back that was willing to clean Fishing Creek but it didn’t happen. Some say it was an enviromental issue. We need do something and this would be a start. If nothing else it would clean up a lot of junk that is not there by nature.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *